Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Attorneys / Lawyers: Eric Goldman Interview: Domain Name Exceptionalism - Is Special Treatment Warranted (Part 2)

« Professor Eric Goldman on Domain Name Exceptionalism - Is Special Treatment Warranted? (Part 1) | Main | Cybersquatting Continues To Be The # 1 Method By Which Consumer Fraud Is Perpetrated »

06/01/2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"That was the first and perhaps only really on point case that dealt with large scale domaining activity for a customer of registrars was grabbing lots of domain names of some words with typographical versions of trademarks and put them in a portfolio and merchandise that portfolio. The Court in that case said that the large scale domaining system violated the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act/"

Actually, there are numerous settlements and injunctions that make it clear that this sort of behavior can constitute bad faith cybersquatting. Like most statutes, the ACPA lists factors which establish bad faith, and does not seek to limit the types of behavior which constitute use, registration or trafficking.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Official Trademark Clearinghouse Agent