July 25, 2006

Princess Cruise Passage Contract

Crown Princess passengers must be keenly aware of the passenger contract they agreed to when they purchased their tickets. Many attorneys who do not practice in this area of law can miss important dates for providing notice, filing a lawsuit, damage limitations on compensation for injuries, choice of venue clauses, limitations on damages for property damage and mental distress and similar issues.  Read your ticket carefully and contact the Traverse Legal law firm for a free consultation with an admiralty and maritime attorney. It is critical that you know and understand your legal rights so you can make informed decisions. 

Here is a link to the Passage Contract listed on the Princess Cruises website. This passage contract may be the one that controls your rights in the Crown Princess maritime accident.  Reviewing this passenger contract will give you some idea of the limitations which likely exist if you were injured in the Crown Princes accident and are exploring your legal rights. 

Here is a key damage limitation provision as well which may (or may not) apply to those injured in the Crown Princess accident:

Notwithstanding any provision of applicable law to the contrary, in cases involving claims for emotional or bodily injury, illness to or death of any Passenger, no lawsuit may be brought against Carrier unless (a) written notice giving full particulars of the claim is delivered to Carrier within 6 months, (b) a lawsuit on such a claim is filed within 1 year from the date of the emotional or bodily injury, illness or death, whichever comes first, and (c) valid service of the lawsuit is made within 90 days of filing the complaint. In all other cases, no lawsuit may be brought against Carrier unless (a) written notice giving full particulars of the claim is delivered to the Carrier within 15 days of termination of the Cruise, (b) the lawsuit on such claim is filed within 6 months from the date the Cruise terminated and (c) valid service of the lawsuit is made within 90 days of filing the complaint. All disputes and matters whatsoever arising out of or relating to Your Cruise, including for personal injury, illness or death, shall be litigated by You individually, and not as a member of any class. If you choose to sue Princess Cruises Lines, Ltd., then such claim must be litigated by You before a court located in the County of Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., to the exclusion of the courts of any other country, state, city or county. You hereby waive any venue or other objection that may be available to any such action or proceeding being brought in any court located in Los Angeles, California. The limitations set forth in this Section 17 shall also apply to and be for the benefit of any agents, independent contractors, concessionaires and suppliers of Carrier.

As Operator and Agent for Operator
Revised 01/05

Given the new reports that a junior crew member panicked and caused the severe list in this accident on board the Crown Princess, there is no question that those injured are entitled to  compensation for their injuries.  Negligence is clear.  Given the large number of similar situations on other cruise ships caused by human error, one has to wonder what the Cruise industry is doing to correct these repeated and common incidents.  Passengers could have been killed.  Many were injured, some seriously.  It is time to make serious changes in protocol on the bridge, increase crew training but systems in place which will reduce the risk of catastrophe in the future.

Here are some more links:


My wife and I arrived in San Francisco on September 8th after a wonderful cruise to Alaska. When we arrived at home, we found that the outside zippers on one piece of luggage had been opened and cleaned out. We checked our belongings and found that the only thing that appeared to be missing was a large bag of hand warmers that my wife packed for the cruise. We ended up not useing them but was very upset that they were gone. I am not requesting that they be replaced, however, I feel that Princess should be notified that someone from the ship is going through the passengers luggage and who knows what else is missing from other passengers luggage. My booking number was HP2MMQ and departure date was August 29th.

We did want to alert you to an important time limitation which Princess Cruises will no doubt argue applies to non-injury claims (reimbursement for travel, lost/damaged luggage, lost/damaged personal property / other damages). For people who have suffered physical injury claims and for those who have not, there may be a provision in your passage contract which states that all travel reimbursement, property loss and other non-injury damages against Princess Cruises may not be pursued unless:

“written notice giving full particulars of the claim is delivered to the carrier within fifteen days of the termination of the cruise and a law suit is filed within 6 months from the date the cruise terminated and that valid service be made on Princess Cruises within 90 days of the filing of the complaint.

Here is a passage contract link from the Crown Princess web site.

Princess Cruises may argue that the cruise terminated on July 18, 2006, which is the day it returned to port. In that case, “written notice” of non-injury damages may be required by Wednesday August 2. It is unclear what is required by the language “full particulars.” The more detail the better.

It is unclear what impact Princess Cruises promises to reimburse certain items will have on this provision.

We are helping our clients meet the notice and documentation requirements for property loss and other reimbursements unrelated to personal injury under the provision noted above. If you intend to retain Traverse Legal, we would encourage you to do so forthwith. If you are still uncertain as to how you will proceed, you should provide notice on your own behalf forthwith. Here are two forms which may apply to your situation (we can not guarantee this is the proper form although it does appear to apply. You should do your own research as well).





46 USCS Appx § 183c

§ 183c. Stipulations limiting liability for negligence invalid

(a) It shall be unlawful for the manager, agent, master, or owner of any vessel transporting passengers between ports of the United States or between any such port and a foreign port to insert in any rule, regulation, contract, or agreement any provision or limitation (1) purporting, in the event of loss of life or bodily injury arising from the negligence or fault of such owner or his servants, to relieve such owner, master, or agent from liability, or from liability beyond any stipulated amount, for such loss or injury, or (2) purporting in such event to lessen, weaken, or avoid the right of any claimant to a trial by court of competent jurisdiction on the question of liability for such loss or injury, or the measure of damages therefor. All such provisions or limitations contained in any such rule, regulation, contract, or agreement are hereby declared to be against public policy and shall be null and void and of no effect.

(b) (1) Subsection (a) shall not prohibit provisions or limitations in contracts, agreements, or ticket conditions of carriage with passengers which relieve a crewmember, manager, agent, master, owner, or operator of a vessel from liability for infliction of emotional distress, mental suffering, or psychological injury so long as such provisions or limitations do not limit such liability if the emotional distress, mental suffering, or psychological injury was--
(A) the result of physical injury to the claimant caused by the negligence or fault of a crewmember or the manager, agent, master, owner, or operator;
(B) the result of the claimant having been at actual risk of physical injury, and such risk was caused by the negligence or fault of a crewmember or the manager, agent, master, owner, or operator; or
(C) intentionally inflicted by a crewmember or the manager, agent, master, owner, or operator.
(2) Nothing in this subsection is intended to limit the liability of a crewmember or the manager, agent, master, owner, or operator of a vessel in a case involving sexual harassment, sexual assault, or rape.

The British-American corporation, Carnival Corporation & PLC is the world's largest cruise operator, comprising 12 cruise brands, including Carnival Cruise Lines, Princess Cruises, Holland America Line, Windstar Cruises and Seabourn Cruise Line in North America; P&O Cruises, Cunard Line, Ocean Village Holidays and Swan Hellenic in the United Kingdom; AIDA and A'ROSA in Germany; Costa Cruises in Southern Europe and P&O Cruises Australia in Australia. It operates 80 ships, totalling more than 139,000 berths with a further 15 ships to be delivered between May 2006 and October 2009.

Carnival Corporation & plc is a dual listed company, with headquarters in Miami, Florida, USA and London, UK. The companies of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc are the two holding companies of Carnival Corporation & plc, operating 80 ships and totaling more than 139,000 berths. A further 15 ships are to be delivered between May 2006 and October 2009. In the year ending 30 November 2005 Carnival had a revenue of $11.087 billion and a net income of $2.257 billion.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Princess Cruise Passage Contract:

Costa Concordia Carnival Cruise Ship Accident Lawyer Attorney Blog Homepage: Tennessee Bus Crash: Eight Killed and Fourteen Injured

Costa Concordia Carnival Cruise Ship Accidenty Lawyer Attorney Categories

"California Train Accident"

Arizona Bus Accident Attorneys Continue Investigation

Arizona Tour Bus Accident Attorneys

Arizona Tour Bus Crash: Lawyers Investigate Cause of the Crash

Arkansas Bus Crash

Attorney Alert: Costa Europa Cruise Liner Accident

Attorney Alert: Louis Cruise Lines Ship

Attorney Alert: Carnival Crown Princess

Attorney Alert: Class Actions

Attorney Alert: D.D. Williamson Explosion

Attorney Alert: Ferry Boat Accident

Attorney Alert: Glendale Train Wreck: Investigation

Attorney Alert: New York Ferry Boat Accident

Attorney Alert: Tanker Explosion Off Virginia

Attorney Practice Alerts: Metrolink Train Accident

California Tour Bus Crash

California Train Accident Lawyers

California Train Wreck

Carnival Cruise Ship Accident

Colorado Tour Bus Accident

Contact a Train Accident Lawyer

Costa Concordia cruise liner Accident

Costa Concordia cruise liner Accident

Crown Princess Cruise Ship Accident Lawyers

Crown Princess Lawyers, Lawsuits, Litigation

Cruise Ship Accidents: Attorney Representation

D.W. Tour & Charter Bus Accident

Dallas Charter Bus Accident

Disney Bus Accidents

Ethan Allen Tour Boat / Ferry Accident In New York

Giant Industries Explosion: Lawyer Representation

Los Angeles Train Accident Attorneys

Los Angeles Train Accident Law Firm

Metro Emergency Hardship Relief Fund

Metrolink / Veolia Train Accident: Los Angeles, CA

Metrolink Attorney, Metrolink Attorneys: Train Crash

Metrolink Claim Form _ SCRRA Claim Forms _ MTA Claims Form

Metrolink Compensation Claims

Metrolink Lawyer: California Train Wreck Update

Metrolink Train Accident: Litigation & Damages

Metrolink Train Injury Lawyers & Lawsuits

Mississippi School Bus Accident

New York Bus Accident

New York Ferry Accident

Philadelphia Duck Boat Crash ‎Update

Playboy Mansion Domainfest IIlness

San Francisco MUNI Train Crash

Seat Belt & Government Regulations on Bus Safety

Starcraft Tour Bus: Seat Belt Options

Tennessee Bus Crash Accident

Tierra Santa Tour Company Bus Crash

Train Accident Litigation Lawyer Advice: Litigation & Settlement

Virginia Bus Accident

Washington DC Metro Train Accident: Attorney Alerts


© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan