RSS Feeds: Does posting third-party sydicated content as an RSS feed on my web site create liability?
Question: "We publish RSS feeds on our community portal - EverythingLubbock.com. I wanted to make sure that there were no rules or restrictions about syndicating RSS feeds on our site."
LinkedIn: Answers: Are there RSS laws or restrictions on Internet syndicated information?
RSS in and of itself presents several traditional legal issues that need to be considered, but there is no specific "RSS" law. You don't mention the type of feeds you are intending to publish, and Several BitTorrent-based peer-to-peer applications support RSS, but I am assuming you are not going to be facilitating Broadcatching like data feeds.
The legal issues you will face, (aside from the contract issues of the RSS syndicator), are similar to the issues faced whenever you are allowing user generated content (UGC) to be presented on your site. First, you are likely acting as an interactive service provider under the Communications Decency Act (CDA), and you will have general publisher immunity. If, however, you start editing the RSS feed and become a content provider by making editor-like decisions you need to be very careful since you might lose your immunity (an example, although not on point, is the roommates.com case in the 9th Circuit). If you are going to take a feed, don't try to edit the content.
Assuming you have immunity, you do not have a problem with product disparagement or defamation. However, immunity does not apply to a copyright infringement claim, and knowledge or intent is not necessary, but you can get immunity under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) if you follow the provisions of that law. As far as trademark infringement goes, if you are notified of an infringement, or you have actual or constructive knowledge of an infringement, you must act reasonably and promptly to stop it. If not, you may have contributory trademark infringement exposure. There are also privacy and commercial exploitation issues to consider, but both of those are usually covered by the immunity provisions of the CDA.
You do have exposure for contract commitments you make in your site's user agreement if the feed content violates a term of the contract. For instance, a site "dedicated exclusively to the remediation of alcohol problems" in which you promise that all information on the site is abstinence-oriented could open you up to liability if your feed content contradicts that promise by either carrying headlines or linking to content through the feed. That is just an example.


Recent Comments