Attorneys Handling Patent Portfolio Management in Times of Economic Crises

Even a year ago, budgets were bigger for pursuing patent protection for technologies.  In the face of current economic crises, organizations are using a more critical eye to scrutinize all areas of corporate expenses, including resources allocated for building a patent portfolio.  Companies with a long term view that recognizes patents as assets, rather than expenses, may have greater tolerance for budgeting money towards IP acquisition.  But, the bottom line is that most of America is cutting back, and as a result, faced with difficult trade-off decisions.

When faced with decisions as to which inventions to patent and where in the world to pursue patent protection, many individualized business considerations come into play.  First off is budget.  An organization should set a budget and working within that budget, develop a patent portfolio strategy based upon the organization’s goals in obtaining patent protection.  Whether a company’s goal is to establish an IP portfolio to monetize, position the company for acquisition, or to patent for defensive purposes, there are many different approaches to portfolio development and management.

Possible strategies include evaluating the importance of different technologies to a company’s business, and patenting only core technologies.  However, side business technologies sometimes spin-off to become profitable new opportunities as economies and technologies change, and patent protection may help provide competitive advantage in an emerging business area.  Accordingly, strategic planning consideration should be given to areas of non-core business prior to deciding to forego patent protection. 

Traditionally, many global strategies included offensive and defensive patenting in the locations of a company’s and/or competitor’s facilities worldwide.  But patenting abroad and enforcing foreign patents may be quite costly, and intelligent portfolio management in the current world economy likely includes a new approach to foreign patent planning. Conversely, patents in some foreign countries are less costly to enforce than they have historically been, so there may be less deterrence to pursuing patent protection in foreign countries.

Other portfolio considerations involve how many patents to pursue within a particular technology area or “family” of patents.  Given patent law reform proposals, emerging USPTO examination guidelines and procedures, and current economics, a targeted and well thought out approach should be employed to make decisions concerning continuation and divisional practice, to strike a balance between broad claim coverage and prosecution efficiency.  

Many organizations have patent review boards or internal patenting criteria to provide guidance for making patenting decisions and to make trade-off decisions to meet budgets.  Companies currently employing patenting guidelines may find themselves needing to update policy to adapt to changing economic situations.  Obtaining and enforcing patents is costly, and taking the time to establish an efficient approach to portfolio development and management may better keep patenting expenses within budgets and yield a more valuable and streamlined portfolio.

If you have a patent issue, or wish to register a patent, you may contact one of our patent attorneys for a free evaluation or call 866.936.7447 (International Toll Free).


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Attorneys Handling Patent Portfolio Management in Times of Economic Crises:

Official Trademark Clearinghouse Agent

Patent Law Blog Homepage: Patent Attorney, Lawyer Law Firm. Handling Patent Prosecution & Litigation Cases

Patent Law: 'How To' Resources


Domain attorney recommended by Domaining.com
© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan