Friday, 20 June 2008

Attorney's Fees for Patent Infringement: What is an "exceptional" case?

What determines whether a party is entitled to attorney's fees in a federal patent infringement suit?  Under federal law, an award of attorneys fees requires an “exceptional case.”  35 USC§ 285 reads: “The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorneys fees to the prevailing party.”  In Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., the Illinois District Court for the Northern District said that an exceptional case requires “inequitable conduct, litigation misconduct, willful infringement, or that the opposing party's conduct was vexatious, frivolous, or otherwise in bad faith.”  Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No. 04 C 5312, Slip Op. 1-2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2007) (Moran, Sen. J.).  But what types of actions fall into these categories?  According to the Illinois District Court, a non-objectively reckless defense of non-infringement does not rise to the level of “exceptional.”

But where a patent case is not close, and where a party willfully infringes on a patent because it did not consult with counsel and made a superficial search of the validity and extent of the patent it infringed, courts have awarded attorney's fees.  Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc., 335 F.Supp.2d 973 (N.D. Iowa 2004), affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded 147 Fed.Appx. 979 (2005).  Attorney's fees have also been awarded where a party failed to rely on the advice of its counsel and negligently did not investigate a pre-existing patent.   nCUBE Corp. v. SeaChange Intern., Inc., 313 F.Supp.2d 361 (D. Del. 2004), affirmed 436 F.3d 1317, 77 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481, rehearing and rehearing en banc denied.

“Weak” allegations of infringement that aren't in bad faith or otherwise frivolous have been held not to be “exceptional.”  Porter v. Farmers Supply Service, Inc., 790 F.2d 882 (Del. 1986), 229 U.S.P.Q. 814.  But a “clearly hopeless” appeal from a finding of infringement where a party left out parts of the relevant law damaging to its case and made frivolous arguments has resulted in an award of attorney's fees.  Id.  In general, any bad faith, misleading, or dilatory tactics in a patent infringement suit will lead to an award of attorney's fees.  American Standard, Inc. v. York Intern. Corp., 244 F.Supp.2d 990 (W.D. Wis. 2002). 

Typically, courts consider whether the parties acted in bad faith, whether the attorney's used frivolous or abusive tactics, or whether the case was not close or otherwise meritless.  Perricone v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., 432 F.3d 1368 (C.A. Fed 2005), 77 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321, on remand 2008 WL 748424.  But, strangely enough, even where a case does meet the “exceptional” standard, courts can award $0 in attorney's fees.  Special Devices, Inc. v. OEA, Inc., 269 F.3d 1340 (C.A. Fed 2001), 60 U.S.P.Q.2d 1694.  In making these decisions, the judge asks whether there is clear and convincing evidence that the actions of one party were exceptional. 

An award of attorney's fees is neither usual or customary in a patent infringement suit, but if you feel that your patent has been willfully infringed by a party who knew or should have known about your patent after a reasonable investigation, or if that party has acted in bad faith or has otherwise acted abusively, you may be entitled to attorney's fees.  Protecting your intellectual property rights should not be taken lightly; your innovation is the lifeblood of the information economy and should be protected to the fullest extent of the law.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Attorney's Fees for Patent Infringement: What is an "exceptional" case?:

Official Trademark Clearinghouse Agent

Trademark Blog Homepage: Trademark Attorney, Lawyer: Trademark Registration & Trademark Infringement

Trademark Infringement: Cease & Desist Letter Help

  • Trademark Threats: 6 Reasons To Take Them Seriously
    Trademark attorney Enrico Schaefer explains what you should do when you receive a trademark cease and desist letter. Listen as he reviews 6 reasons why you should take any trademark threat letter seriously, and what you should do when you receive a cease and desist.
  • How to handle a trademark cease and desist letter?
    Trademark Attorney Brian Hall discusses what you should do when you receive a trademark cease and desist letter. What a trademark threat letter? Why trademark owners send trademark threat letters? What you should do when you receive a trademark infringement threat letter.

How to Trademark A Name?

  • How to Register a Trademark - USPTO
    You can establish rights in a mark based on legitimate use of the mark. However, owning a Federal trademark registration on the Principal Register provides several advantages ... here is how.
  • Types of U.S. Trademarks - USPTO
    Specific types of trademarks include: Service marks which identify and distinguish the source of a service rather than a product; Certification marks are used by someone other than its owner, to certify quality or other characteristics of such person's goods or services; Collective marks are trademarks or service marks used by the members of a collective group or organization.
  • Definition of a "Trademark"- USPTO
    A trademark includes any word, name, symbol, or design, or any combination used, or intended to be used, in commerce to identify and distinguish the goods of one manufacturer or seller from goods manufactured or sold by others, and to indicate the source of the goods. In short, a trademark is a brand name.
  • How To Copyright and Trademark a Catchphrase!
    Wondering how to trademark a catchphrase? You should also think about how to copyright a catchphrase. Some intellectual property can be protected by both a trademark and copyright registration.


Domain attorney recommended by
© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan