ICANN Addresses Registration Abuse

In February of 2009 a Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG) was chartered by ICANN’s Generic Names Supporting Organization Council (GNSO), to present findings and concrete recommendations in addressing domain name registration abuse in generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs). Upon chartering the RAPWG, the GNOS Council committed not to commit to a decision on whether or not to initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP).

However, the terms of GNSO Council’s commitment not to commit was fulfilled! The RAPWG has at long last, and after a public comment period where the RAPWG received comments/criticisms on its Initial Report, released its Final Report on May 29th.

ICANN Releases its Fourth Draft of the DAG

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), published its fourth version of the Draft Applicant Guidebook (DAG) on May 31, 2010. ICANN uses the DAG for informing and instructing the public about registering generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs).

This newest draft would require all registries of new gTLDs to honor marks validated by the proposed Trademark Clearinghouse. The Trademark Clearinghouse will include all nationally and multi-nationally registered marks including, “from countries where there is no substantive review”.

Cybersquatting Trademark Protected .me Domains: A Lesson for New gTLDs which ICANN Has Failed to Learn.

As can be seen by a WIPO & NAF serach using DomainFight.net, cybersquatting .me domains was a popular pastime in 2008 including trademark protected domains owned by Porsche, Exxon Mobil, Blue Cross and Blue Shield, America Online,     Mozilla Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company.  This does not include the threat letters sent out by trademark holders, which in many instaces cause a behind the scenes and unreported transfer of domains. 

As noted over at The Domains blog "Toyota.Me Sell for 90K: Why Shouldn’t a Registry Be Liable for Profiting From the Sale of Trademark Infringing Domains?" Each time a new domain extension is introduced, it simply creates a brand new platform for domain name cybersquatting. It is even worse when the Registry offering the domains thorough auction or otherwise end up reaping the initial financial rewards of obvious trademark infringement.  Where is the accountability?  Why hasn't ICANN done anythign to make registries and registrars more accountable for trademark issues?

In their comments to ICANN concerning the new domain extensions, The Domains blog makes an important point.  If the number of domain extensions,  gTLD’s, is greatly expanded, how will trademark holders, celbrities, famous people and others protect themselves from bad faith cybersquatting? See Open Letter To ICANN: Our Take On the New Domain Extensions

Cybersquatting Attorneys: Recent Cybersquatting Cases and Issues across the World Wide Web

Traverse Legal’s lawyers constantly monitor the latest information on the World Wide Web concerning cybersquatting cases and issues. Here is this week's round-up:

Chineese Domain Scam
By admin
As authorized anti-cybersquatting organization we hereby suspect the alleged Meiao Co.,Ltd to be a domain grabber. Hence we need you confirmation for two things, First of all, whether this alleged Meiao Co.,Ltd is your business partner ...

typosquatting
By renamecor
Is it still classed as cybersquatting if you are actually sending them the visitors via an affiliate link / code ? Basically doing what they should have already done (ie bought the typo url). Now I understand that most affiliate ...

Domain Names and Trademarks - Legal Issues
Search Engine Roundtable - USA
Both enacted in 1999 to deal with cybersquatting. UDRP is like biding arbitration. Less formal. No hearing. ACPA on the other hand is more involved, ...

Cybersquatting and Domain Name Dispute Attorneys: Recent Cybersquatting and Domain Name Issues across the World Wide Web

Traverse Legal’s lawyers constantly monitor the latest information on the World Wide Web concerning cybersquatting and domain name issues.  Here is this week’s cybersquatting and domain name dispute round-up:

iTunes 'cybersquatting' row threatens Nominet authority
Silicon.com - UK
By Jo Best The authority of the UK's domain name registrar has been called into question after the owner of the domain name iTunes.co.uk investigated what ...

What's a domain name worth?
Financial Post - Toronto,Ontario,Canada
"[True cybersquatting is] if you take a name that is confusingly close to the name of a business to mislead or confuse," said Byron Holland, president of ...

New Owners of DNHour.com Plan to Continue and Develop This Pligg Site
WebWire (press release) - Atlanta,GA,USA
As a domain name dispute, cybersquatting and trademark lawyer that had visited the DNHour.com site many times previous to this purchase, Mr. Schaefer did ...

Changing WHOIS Privacy Protection In Domain Name Dispute Can Be Considered Registration In Bad Faith

An interesting domain dispute has recently come down from WIPO involving a new interpretation of WHOIS privacy protection services and their relation to the “registration in bad faith” UDRP element.  The case, BMEzine.com, LLC v. Gregory Wicks, concerned the domain name bme.com.  This decision has interesting and widespread ramifications for domainers who arbitrarily change their WHOIS information.

Cybersquatting the Obama-Biden Ticket: Domain investors still don't understand the UDRP and ACPA

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time - Blogs from CNN.com

The Obama campaign has succeeded partly through astute, unprecedented use of the Internet. But some of the most obvious Web site domain names for the Obama-Biden ticket might not actually belong to the campaign anytime soon — if ever.

After hearing about Obama's selection for his number-two slot, anyone who tried to surf to obamabiden.org was re-directed to an eBay page selling that domain name for a starting bid of $100,000.

As of 6:30 p.m. ET, there were no bids listed.

The same seller lists 15 similar domain names up for sale, including obama-biden.com, obama-biden.org, and obamabiden-08.com.

Technorati Tags: obama, biden, cybersquatting

WIPO Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the week ending June 6, 2008.

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). There are 31 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 26 domains were transferred after finding of cybersquatting and 5 UDRP complaints were denied.

NAF Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the week ending June 6, 2008

Managing Partner Enrico Schaefer: "Traverse Legal's attorneys know trademark and cybersquatting law and pride themselves on advanced litigation techniques which are both cost-effective and budget oriented.  Because we are a boutique litigation law firm, we know how to strategically and efficiently accomplish our client's goals. "

If you have a trademark or cybersquatting issue you may contact one of our trademark and domain dispute attorneys for a free evaluation or call 866.936.7447 (International Toll Free).

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). There are 31 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 25 domains were transferred after finding of cybersquatting, 1 UDRP complaint was denied and 5 complaints withdrawn.

WIPO Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the week ending May 30, 2008.

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). There are 45 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 30 domains were transferred after findings of cybersquatting, 6 UDRP complaints were denied, 1 denied in part, and 9 resulted in a cancellation.

NAF Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the week ending May 30, 2008

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). There are 26 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 25 domains were transferred after findings of cybersquatting, 1 UDRP complaint was withdrawn.

WIPO Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the weeks ending May 5, May 16, and May 23, 2008.

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). There are 93 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 83 domains were transferred after findings of cybersquatting, 10 UDRP complaints were denied.

NAF Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the weeks ending May 9, May 16, and May 23, 2008

"Our cybersquatting attorneys know how trademark law works in cyberspace. If your attorneys don't know how to access back-end registry data, as well as how to leverage the who-is data, to your advantage, you won't get the bang for your legal dollar you deserve.   Because we are a boutique litigation law firm, we know how to strategically and efficiently accomplish our client's goals.  If your company does not protect its trademark rights against cybersquatters, you could lose your rights altogether."

If you have a trademark or cybersquatting issue you may contact one of our trademark and domain dispute attorneys for a free evaluation or call 866.936.7447 (International Toll Free).

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). There are 133 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 97 domains were transferred after findings of cybersquatting, 13 UDRP complaints were denied, and 23 resulted in withdrawals.

NAF Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for Week Ending May 02, 2008

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF). There are 38 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 34 domains were transferred after findings of cybersquatting, 3 UDRP complaints were denied, and 1 complaint withdrawn.

WIPO Domain Dispute Decisions under the Cybersquatting Provisions of the UDRP for the week ending May 02, 2008

The following Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) decisions were entered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). There are 27 panel decisions, and of those decisions, 19 domains were transferred after findings of cybersquatting, 8 UDRP complaints were denied.