2013.02.13

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

When you file a WIPO or NAF UDRP proceeding, you need to make sure you know what you're doing as the trademark holder or complainant.  Just because you want a domain which someone won't sell to you, does not mean you can file a Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) arbitration to seek a forceful transfer of that domain name to your possession from the registrar.

If you allege cybersquatting, and a UDRP panelist or panelists determine that you have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking, you may end up with more than egg on your face.  Rest assured, bloggers on the internet will pick up the decision and essentially call you bad names and laugh at you.  This will not be good for that trademark and brand you're trying to protect.  But it could get worse under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) if you choose to file a cybersquatting lawsuit against a domain owner.  There are examples of cases where the defendant has won up to $100,000 as a penalty based on a finding that the plaintiff/complainant attempted to engage in reverse domain domain name hijacking.  Reverse domain name hijacking occurs when your cybersquatting allegations are frivolous and it should have been clear to your cybersquatting attorney that no claim existed.  Essentially, it is trying to use the leverage of the legal system or the UDRP against a legitimate domain owner in order to force a transfer of the domain for free.  There are many generic and descriptive domain names out there which do not have trademark issues.  There are instances where people register domain names long before you or your business had trademark rights.

All too often, we see trademark infringement attorneys who don't understand the ACPA or UDRP filing federal court lawsuits or UDRP arbitrations with WIPO or NAF without fully understanding the law. 

COMMENTS

And just to remind some that there are even harsher penalties than the $100k. Public shame!

http://www.ricksblog.com/my_weblog/2013/01/ring-the-bell-and-let-them-hear-reverse-domain-hijackers-all-listed-right-here.html

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834208fd253ef017ee87c41e3970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reverse Domain Name Hijacking:

Official Trademark Clearinghouse Agent

Cybersquatting Law Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Lawyer Attorney Law Firm

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

  • Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
    Reverse domain name hijacking occurs when a trademark owner files a UDRP arbitration against a domain name owner on frivolous claims of trademark infringement. Domain name Hijacking is real. Find out how to protect your domain names.

Domain Theft & Stolen Domain Name Help

  • Domain Theft & Stolen Domain Name Help
    We often hear "someone stole my domain name." A domain name theft attorney can help you recover a stolen domain whether the thief is an employee, business partner, web developer, web hosting company or third party.

ARCHIVES

Domain attorney recommended by Domaining.com
© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan