Is Domains By Proxy Guilty of Cybersquatting? When the domain registrant hides their WhoIs contact data under proxy ..

We regularly get calls from companies whose trademarks are being cybersquatted on domain names where the WhoIs (domain registrant / owner) information is protected by a proxy service, such as Domains By Proxy. Typically, the proxy service is requested pursuant to the RAA to unlock the privacy protect service upon reasonable evidence of actionable harm has been provided, thus revealing the name and contact information for the true registrant. But what happens if the proxy does not unlock the WhoIs data?

Baylor University v. Domains By Proxy, Inc., et.al., FA0802001145654 (Nat Arb. Forum Mar. 25, 2008) Name of Registrant at the time of filing of the Complaint was Domains By Proxy. After filing of Complaint, GoDaddy.com confirmed with the NAF that the various domain names were registered in the names of various different registrants. NAF requested that Complainant amend its Complaint to choose which Respondent and corresponding domain name to remove from the complaint. Complainant amended its Complaint, but Complainant contended that Domains by Proxy is the proper Respondent, and did eventually include them as one of the Respondents. There were facts in the record that indicated Domains By Proxy refused to give up the identities of the true registrants of the domain names even after formal requests by Complainant, and only did so after the UDRP was filed. As a result, the Panel in the proceeding found that Domains By Proxy was the proper Respondent in the case, since it was the Registrant named in the WHOIS registration information in relating to all of the disputed domains names when the Complaint was filed.

Here is a list of WIPO and NAF UDRP decisions where Domains By Proxy has been named as the Respondent.


Domains By Proxy is a service known to hide cybersquatting domain registrants. there a variety of things a good c3erbysquatting attorney will do to deal with trademark infringement issues on domain names where the domain registrant is being hidden by Domains By Proxy service. Sometimes unlocking the privacy service to show the Whois data is a good first step. Sometimes, filing a UDRP on multiple infringing domains is the best way to go. Contact a domain dispute lawyer for more information.....

Domains By Proxy is often used by known cybersquatters to hide their identity. There are ways for you to remove the proxy from the domain name to reveal the true owner registrant of the domain. A domain name or UDRP attorney can help.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Domains By Proxy Guilty of Cybersquatting? When the domain registrant hides their WhoIs contact data under proxy ..:

Official Trademark Clearinghouse Agent

Cybersquatting Law Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Lawyer Attorney Law Firm

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

  • Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
    Reverse domain name hijacking occurs when a trademark owner files a UDRP arbitration against a domain name owner on frivolous claims of trademark infringement. Domain name Hijacking is real. Find out how to protect your domain names.

Domain Theft & Stolen Domain Name Help

  • Domain Theft & Stolen Domain Name Help
    We often hear "someone stole my domain name." A domain name theft attorney can help you recover a stolen domain whether the thief is an employee, business partner, web developer, web hosting company or third party.


Domain attorney recommended by Domaining.com
© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan