Currently browsing January 2010 Archives.

2010.01.24

Trademark & Cybersquatting Update - INTA Makes the Argument Against Unlimited New gTLDs

trademark and cybersaquatting attorneysTrademark lawyers and trademark organizations such as the International Trademark Association (INTA) have kept a close eye on ICANN's proposal to allow virtually unlimited new gTLDs and the impact such a move would have on brand owners and the stability of the internet itself. In this interview with INTA Executive Director Alan Drewsen, the Manager of External Relations in Internet & Judiciary Claudio DiGangi and Manager of Communications Matthew Schmidt, the INTA makes the case against the current move to open up the gTLD space, and encourages trademark owners to participate the comment period for the New gTLD Program – Draft Expressions of Interest/Pre-Registrations Model. (You can view the existing comments here or the recommendations to create a Trademark Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure here). 

Announcer:  Today’s program is brought to you by the attorneys at Traverse Legal, PLC,  a global law firm specializing in Internet Law, Trademark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Cybersquatting, Internet Defamation, Non-Compete & Trade Secret Law and Complex Litigation.  If you have a legal matter arising on the web, contact one of Traverse Legal’s Internet Lawyers today.  Now here’s your host, Damien Allen.

Continue reading Trademark & Cybersquatting Update - INTA Makes the Argument Against Unlimited New gTLDs >>
2010.01.21

WHOIS Privacy Protection Considered Material Falsification Under CAN-SPAM Act

CircleID reports that a recent 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision has held that WHOIS privacy protection can be considered a "material falsification" under the CAN-SPAM Act.  The CAN-SPAM Act, which prohibits deceptive email headers and subject lines, states that "registration information is materially falsified if it is altered or concealed in a manner that would impair the ability of a recipient of the message…to identify, locate, or respond to a person who initiated the electronic mail message…."  The 9th Circuit, in US v. Kilbride, stated that the use of a WHOIS privacy protection service to hide the identity of a domain name registrant constitutes a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act because it prevents an end-user from contacting the owner of a domain name to opt-out of email communications.

While the full import of this decision is still unclear, it is safe to say that this decision is one that website owners should take very seriously, especially if the website distributes marketing messages through email or telephone lists.  If you are a website owner or domainer who seeks advice on website agreements, website compliance, the CAN-SPAM Act, or Internet law, contact one of our expert Internet lawyers today at 866.936.7447.

Cybersquatting Law Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Lawyer Attorney Law Firm

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

  • Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
    Reverse domain name hijacking occurs when a trademark owner files a UDRP arbitration against a domain name owner on frivolous claims of trademark infringement. Domain name Hijacking is real. Find out how to protect your domain names.

Domain Theft & Stolen Domain Name Help

  • Domain Theft & Stolen Domain Name Help
    We often hear "someone stole my domain name." A domain name theft attorney can help you recover a stolen domain whether the thief is an employee, business partner, web developer, web hosting company or third party.

ARCHIVES

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan