866.936.7447    231.932.0411
Traverse Legal: Attorneys and Advisors - Global Representation of Business InterestsOur attorneys have represented, handled matters and litigated cases against companies located across the globe
Internet LawIntellectual PropertyDomain DisputesCorporate ServicesComplex LitigationHome | About Us | Contact 

« Pizza Hut Fails to Secure Domain Names as Part of Its Rebranding Effort | Main | Trademark Owners Must Pursue Cybersquatters or Potentially Lose Their Trademark Rights »

2008.10.14

Cyberlaw Update: Google sued for allowing typo-squatting

Of course Google profits from millions of typo-squatting websites from Google's Adsense advertising program. But are they liable for trademark infringement or contributory trademark infringement? The  Lawyers in the Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. class action lawsuit alleging the Google Adsense for Domains (AFD) program is assisting in violating trademarks are about to find out. A hearing on is scheduled for as early as next month in which Plaintiffs' attorneys will ask an Illinois federal judge to allow the case against Google to proceed.

Edelman and other lawyers have filed a class action lawsuit representing domain owners who claim the Google Adsense for Domains (AFD) program is assisting in violating trademarks. A hearing is scheduled for as early as next month in which Edelman will ask an Illinois federal judge to allow the case against Google to proceed.

The Mountain View, California, company did not respond for comment on how much revenue is generated via typo-squatting.

But Google attorney Maria Moran says Edelman's allegations are "misguided," and that Google is doing nothing illegal because it "merely distributes third-party advertisements."

Google is immune from liability, she adds. "Google's sweeping trademark protection policies provide that Google will immediately remove any allegedly infringing domains from its AFD program at the request of the trademark holder."

Edelman, however, said Google is attempting to confuse two laws: the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

The DMCA "safe harbor" provision protects sites from claims that they host copyright infringing material if that material was put there by users and if the sites remove material upon notice from copyright holders. Google relies on the safe harbor provisions to avoid liability for videos posted on its YouTube site, for example.

But Edelman says Google is wrong to try to invoke a notification safe harbor as a defense to typo-squatting. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834208fd253ef01053588c7d5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cyberlaw Update: Google sued for allowing typo-squatting:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Recent Comments

Traverse Legal, PLC | 810 Cottageview Dr., G20, Traverse City, MI, 49684
(West Coast Office) 16830 Ventura Boulevard Suite 358, Los Angeles (Encino), CA 91436-1707
Maryland Office: 22776 Three Notch Rd. ,Suite 201, Lexington Park, MD.
231-932-0411 (phone) | 866-936-7447 (toll free) | 231-932-0636 (fax)
web site design by nielsen design group | architecture and implementation by leelanau.com