January 27, 2012

Copyright License Termination: The Clock is Ticking

Welcome to Copyright Law Radio. We bring you the best in copyright news, legal advice and information.  From copyright infringement claims and defenses to threat letter issues, DMCA takedown notice letters, copyright licensing, and legal analysis of the latest copyright law cases, we have a copyright attorney who can answer your copyright questions.

This is Brian Hall, an attorney with Traverse Legal, PLC; a law firm that handles copyright litigation and copyright matters throughout the United States.  Today, I will be addressing an issue that it coming up for the first time in the history of copyright law.

 

In particular, it is because dating back to January of 1978, when the new Copyright Act was passed, there was a provision added that essentially said, after 35 years, any copyright owner who licensed or transferred rights to someone else will have the ability to cancel or terminate that grant of a license.  This is extremely important for several reasons. 

First, if you are the owner of a copyrighted work and you licensed or granted the ability to someone else to use that particular work, you will have for the first time ever the chance to get the rights back to you solely.  And the reason that’s important is because you might be able to renegotiate, so to speak, and cure what might have been an unfair or unprofitable license arrangement between you and the actual licensee.  However, in order for you to take advantage of this, there are several things that you need to do.  The most important being, after the 35 years from which you licensed to work, you need to provide two years in advance, in particular, notice in writing to the licensee saying that you will be terminating that license.  You will need to file that notice letter with the U.S. Copyright Office, and there are other requirements in order to satisfy the statute.  And when I say the statute, I’m talking about the Copyright Act or title 17 section 203 (17 U.S.C §203).  So, you would be well served speaking with a copyright attorney that can interpret that particular language in that section 203 provision and guide you as to how you need to comply with it. 

The reason this is also important is because licensees of these particular works may also be facing these issues for the first time.  They may be receiving a letter from the copyright owner notifying them that they will no longer allow the license to continue.  This may force the licensee to renegotiate.  So, whether you’re in the music recording industry or have licensed works for use in your business or elsewhere, this is something you need to be aware of.  Copyright attorneys know that this is coming up, but it is less likely that individual citizens including copyright owners and licensees of copyrights will know that this is actually about to occur.  So, once again, 2013 marks the start the applicability of this particular provision of the statute.  Again, the key dates to keep in the mind are 35 years from when you actually licensed the work is when you can first take advantage of this, and in order to do so, you must provide written notice at least two years before you intend to terminate the transfer of license granted on or after January 1, 1978. 

Once again, if you have questions, you would be well served speaking with a copyright lawyer who can guide you through this important process.

This has been Brian Hall addressing what will be a critically important new update to copyright law starting in 2013.

You’ve been listening to Copyright Law Radio, where copyright infringement, licensing, litigation, and news are always the topic of the day.  Whether you are a copyright attorney or a client, we are the number one resource for all your copyright questions.

COMMENTS

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834208fd253ef0168e6214fbe970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Copyright License Termination: The Clock is Ticking:

Copyright Infringement & Internet Defamation Blog Homepage: Copyright Infringment Lawyer, Internet Defamation, and Internet Privacy

ARCHIVES

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan