traverse city cadillac, antrim, grand traverse, leelanau, kalkaska, attorney, lawyer, law firm, mi, michigan
traverse city attorney, lawyer, law firm michigantraverse city mi attorneys, lawyers, law firm michigantraverse city attorney, lawyer, law firm michigantraverse city attorneys, lawyers, law firm michigantraverse city mi attorney, lawyer, law firm michigantraverse city attorneys, lawyers, law firm michigan

« Understand Your Michigan No-Fault Rights | Main | Third-Party Rights »

First Party Rights

MICHIGAN NO-FAULT ACT

MICHIGAN’S INSURANCE LAW FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS

Automobile accidents can result in injury, death and disability. A person injured in a car/automobile accident in Michigan has legal rights which are defined by Michigan’s No-Fault Act. There are two types of no-fault claims, a “first-party” claim to claimants own insurance company and a "third-party" claim against the negligent driver.

FIRST PARTY CLAIMS:

First-Party benefits are payable to anyone who suffers an injury arising out of the ownership, operation, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle. Michigan auto accident first-party claims are made to a claimant's own no-fault insurer. The claimant's insurer, by thhe terms of the insurance contract and under the no-fault law, must pay no-fault benefits for expenses resulting from the automobile, truck, bus or motorcycle accident. First-party auto accident coverage inludes reimbursement for medical expenses, wage loss, replacement services, mileage, survivor's loss, funeral expenses, and attendant care.


Specific Michigan First-Party No-Fault Benefits that you should be entitled to from your own insurance company include:

Lifetime Payment Of Medical Bills
Michigan auto accident law provides that medical coverage is provided for life as long as the treatment received is related to the automobile accident. The allowable expense benefit is payable for life and is unlimited in amount. The only requirement is that the expense be "reasonable" in amount and that the service, product or accommodation for which the expense is charged is reasonably necessary for the injured person’s care, recovery or rehabilitation.

To qualify for medical expense reimbursement, a bill must be reasonable and the bill must actually be incurred. Payable medical expenses include "all reasonable charges incurred for reasonably necessary products, services and accommodations for an injured person’s care, recovery or rehabilitation." Allowable medical expenses include hospital and physician charges, prescriptions, in-home nursing care, physical therapy and rehabilitation, vocational rehabilitation, medical mileage, artificial limbs, orthopedic appliances, etc. In order to avoid payment of legitimate medical expenses, insurance companies will often claim a procedure ordered by your physician to be unnecessary, or that the doctor or medical service provider billed too much.
Michigan insurance companies have two basic kinds of medical coverage in the event of an accident, un-coordinated polcies and coordinated policies. The terms of your policy control which benefits you will receive. An uncoordinated policy pays benefits regardless of the presence of other health insurance. A coordinated policy requires secondary health insurance to pay first, and provides that residual amounts are paid by the auto insurance.

It is common for a primary health insurance policy and an automobile insurance policy to contain contradictory language about who has the first obligation to pay medical bills. If there are any questions in this area, or bills are not being paid in a timely manner, an attorney should be promptly consulted. If a bill is not submitted within one year of the date it is incurred, the insurance company will likely argue that it is no longer obligated to pay.

Wage Loss Benefits

An accident victim is also entitled to recover no-fault PIP benefits for a loss of income the injured person "would have performed" had he or she not suffered injury in the accident. This work loss benefit is payable for three years and is limited to 85% of the victim’s gross income. Furthermore, the monthly benefit is subject to a monthly maximum which is adjusted each year.

Michigan No-Fault law allows for an injured individual to receive 85% of their salary if a doctor has disabled the injured party from working due to the injuries suffered in the automobile accident. This benefit cannot exceed a period of 3 years. There are reductions for taxes and a cap on the total amount which an insurance company need pay for wage loss.

Attendant Care Benefits

Attendant care benefits are sometimes referred to as Nursing Services. Severe Injuries often require the injured person to receive supervision and assistance for prolonged periods of time. It is not uncommon for a physician to state that a severe injury warrants around the clock supervision. There is no firm guideline that indicates how much an insurance company must pay for attendant care. Often, the quality of care and ability to choose the care provider are dependent upon an insurance carrier fulfilling its obligations under its contract of insurance. You should contact our office to secure premium attendant care benefits for yourself or a loved one.

Replacement Services

This benefit is called the "replacement service expense" benefit and is typically payable when an injured person can no longer perform domestic related tasks such as house cleaning, lawn work, cooking, babysitting, etc. In these situations, the injured person is allowed to be reimbursed up to $20 per day to hire other people, to perform these services. Under the Michigan system, an injured person is also entitled to receive a personal service allowance not to exceed $20 per day to reimburse the victim for expenses reasonably incurred in obtaining ordinary and necessary services in lieu of those that the victim would have performed for the benefit of the victim or the victim’s dependents had the victim not been injured. If you paid or promised to pay for household services, chores, errands, etc. that you would have accomplished on your own, then you may be entitled to reimbursement for these expenses. The person performing the services could be a family member, friend or stranger. A physician needs to document that you are unable to do these tasks on your own, and your insurance company may require documentation of who performed what services for you and when. Michigan law allows for only three years of replacement service benefits.



In cases of severe injury, benefits include an obligation to pay for renovations to a home or apartment, and in some cases, to even construct a new residence if such accommodations are now reasonably necessary. Room and board expenses may also be recovered if an accident victim would otherwise require institutionalization were it not for the fact that the victim is cared for at home. If special transportation is required such as handicapper equipped automobiles, specially equipped vans, or other accomodations, your first party carrier must pay for the cost of those vehicles. The allowable expense benefit also includes reimbursement for mileage to and from reasonably necessary medical care. In the cases of severely injured victims who require the appointment of a guardian or conservator, Michigan courts have held that such probate related expenses are also included as part of the allowable expense benefit.

Survivor Loss

In the case of death, the no-fault statute provides for payment of survivor’s loss benefits to the dependents for a three year period . Survivor’s loss benefits compensate a decedent’s dependent for a loss of contributions of tangible things of economic value that the dependents would have received for support during their dependency. Survivor’s loss benefits include the after tax income of the decedent and the value of fringe benefits which the decedent’s dependents have lost as a result of the death.

Mileage Reimbursement
Medical treatment and physical therapy often require an injured person to travel to and from appointments. Michigan No-Fault Law provides for the reimbursement for mileage traveled to and from doctor's appointments. You should keep track of all doctor vists so that you can obtain the correct reimbursement.

Michigan First-Party Order of Priority

Although your own insurance is first in line to pay in a Michigan automobile accident, there are occasions where an uninsured individual is an innocent passenger in a motor vehicle. The No-Fault Act sets forth the priority under which the proper insurance company is legally responsible.

February 19, 2004 in First Party Rights | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834208fd253ef00d83425829953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference First Party Rights:

Comments

I was injured in an auto accident but my insurance company refuses to pay my medical bills. I have been turned over to the collection agency. My doctors won't treat me anymore. What can I do? It sounds like I need a lawyer....

Posted by: Grand Traverse | Feb 21, 2004 2:14:08 PM

The same thing happened to me. The insurance adjuster kept asking for more infomation. They kept delaying payment until bill collectors started calling. I hired an aggressive attorney who wrote a letter, made some calls and got my medical bills paid.

Posted by: Kalkaska Gaylord | Feb 21, 2004 2:16:55 PM

I was in an accident driving someone elses truck. I don't have a car or any car insurance. My daughter and her friend were severely injured. We don't have any health care insurance either. We don'ty qualify for medicare or medicaide coverage. How am I supposed to pay for my daughter's medical bills, doctor bills and hospital bills? What if the doctor's refuse to treat my daughter because we can't pay?

Posted by: Grayling Michigan Driver | Mar 7, 2004 4:01:51 PM

Actually, your daughter and her friend are covered for all medical bills for life for injuries and treatment arising out of the collision. Even if you have no insurance, first-arty rights are determined by the order of priority which is summarized below:

Driver or Passenger Order of Priority

1st priority is your own insurance policy, if none then...
2nd priority is to the insurance company of a resident relative (i.e. spouse, parent or sibling), if none then...
3rd priority is to the insurer of the owner of the vehicle occupied, if none then...
4th priority is to the insurer of the operator of the vehicle occupied, if none then...
5th priority is to the Assigned Claims Facility.

So you can see, there are no gaps. The Michigan Assigned Claims Facility will assign an insurance company to pay all first-party claims if no other priority applies.

Posted by: First Party Priority | Mar 7, 2004 4:51:03 PM

No-Fault - Intent To Cause Injury - Evidence Of Intoxication

The Michigan Court of Appeals in an unpublished decision has ruled: Where plaintiff was injured when he jumped from a moving vehicle driven by another person, defendant-insurance company is liable for personal injury protection benefits. The trial court properly allowed the jury to hear evidence concerning plaintiff's intoxication, and properly instructed the jury that intoxication was a factor to consider in determining whether plaintiff could have formed the subjective intent to cause his injury. An intent to cause his own injuries would have disqualified him from receiving PIP benefits.
- Grand Valley Health Center v. Amerisure Ins. Co. (MARCH 12, 2004)

Posted by: Leelanau County, Leland | Mar 12, 2004 10:31:37 AM

Even though a driver was intoxicated when he collided with an ambulance, he is immune under the no-fault act from a reimbursement suit by the ambulances insurer because he did not intend the harm caused by the accident. Under MCL 500.3135(3), an exception to the tort immunity conferred by the no-fault act exists for intentionally caused harm. Although intoxicated, there is nothing to support a finding that the driver actually intended to collide with the ambulance and damage it. Whether the drivers conduct may have been wilful and wanton should not be part of the analysis. Because the driver did not intend the harm caused, he is immune from the insurers suit.
- American Alternative Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, et al.

Posted by: Driver was Intoxicated | May 10, 2004 9:25:01 AM

The dispute over attendant care concerns the hourly rate Defendant is willing to pay. Plaintiff contends that $18 an hour is a commercially reasonable rate. Defendant refuses to pay Plaintiffs care givers more than $10 an hour, primarily because her care givers have been acquaintances and family. The No-Fault Act makes no distinction between what an insurance company should pay to a claimant=s acquaintances and relatives, versus what it should pay to a commercial provider of the same services. An insurance company is required by law to pay a commercially reasonable rate.
It is well established in Michigan that a family member who provides attendant care in the home to seriously injured relatives is entitled to be compensated for such services under the allowable expenses provision of '3107(1)(a). In Vanmarter v American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company, 114 Mich App 171 (1982), the Court of Appeals stated:
"A....(the insurance company) Defendant would be liable for the services they were performed in a hospital or nursing home. If we were to accept Defendant=s reading of MCL 500.3107(A); MSA 24.13107(A), we would penalize both the insured and his family for providing care which would otherwise be performed by a less personalized health care industry..."
Similarly, in Manley v DAIIE, 425 Mich 140 (1986), the Michigan Supreme Court held the "no-fault carrier was obligated to pay attendant care services to the parents of the seriously injured minor child even though those parents were legally obligated to provide services to the minor under common law." The Supreme Court stated at 153:
"A no-fault insurer is not relieved of the obligation to pay no-fault benefits for products, services and accommodations provided a child which, if the injured person were an adult, are allowable expenses within the meaning '3107. Although the parents of the child might be obligated to pay for such products, services or accommodations as Anecessary essential to the health and comfort of the child@ if there was not a no-fault act, there is a no-fault act. Under that act, the question is whether the products, service or accommodation is an allowable expense, not whether someone else might also be legally obligated to pay such expenses under some other provision or rule of law."

The Michigan Appellate Courts have also clearly held that, in valuing the services rendered by family members to seriously injured resident relatives, it is appropriate to look at the commercial rates charged for similar services. In this regard, the Court of Appeals held in Sharp v Preferred Risk Insurance Company, 142 Mich App 409 (1985), at 514;
"...the trial court=s order is consistent with Manley. Manley states that comparison to rates charged by institutions provides a valid method for determining whether the amount of an expense was reasonable and for placing a value on comparable services performed (by family members)." 127 Mich App 455. The plaintiff charges less than similar institutions, other nursing services. What they charge would be a reasonable amount to charge for the previously mentioned activities and services under Manley.

The Manley case held that the market value of the services is the yardstick by which the reimbursement must be measured:
AServices performed by Mr. and Mrs. Manley (care givers to their son, John) which are allowable expenses@ under the rule previously stated are implicitly purchased by John at their reasonable market value.

Similarly, in Reed v Citizens Insurance Company, 444 Mich 964 (1994), the Court of Appeals again held that rates charged by commercial agencies are appropriate to utilize in establishing the value of services rendered by relatives. In this regard, the Court of Appeals stated at pages 451-453:
A...it has been held that under MCL 500.3107(A); ...(which now is MCL 500.3107(1)(a)...) family members may be compensated for the services that they provide at home to an injured person in need of care...We hold that when an injured is unable to care for himself and would be institutionalized were a family member not willing to provide home care, a no-fault insurer is liable to pay the cost of maintenance in the home...We agree with Justice Boyle=s opinion in Manley... Where a person who normally would require institutional treatment is cared for at home in a quasi institutional setting made possible by the love and dedication of the injured victim's family, the test for Aallowable expenses@ should not differ from that set out in MCLA 500.3107(A)... The reasonableness of the expenses incurred may be judged by a comparison of rates charged by institutions.

Posted by: Attendant Care Rates | Jul 12, 2004 9:18:41 AM

My grandaughter was injured in 1996,at the age of two, in an automoblie accident,and is paraplegic.I am her legal guardian. Farmer's Insurance purchased a house for her and I had to sign responsibility for care and upkeep. Being in ignorance of the law, I did so, because this was the only house out of all we looked at that their nurse case manager recommended. The new, open floor plan homes for the same price, she denied. This house is very tightly made and my child is restricted in her access to anything, including the bathroom sink, and shower.The hallways are narrow, and she has trouble navigating. The house is unevenly heated and cooled because of lack of registers. The list goes on and on.....The house is in poor condition. The wiring,plumbling,roof,porches,windows are all defective. She cannot exit the house safely in case of fire, from most areas.I put in a $6000.00 furnace a month ago,because we almost died last year from carbon monoxide.We had no heat from February of last year because the furnace and chimney were in such bad condition The van Farmer's purchased is also defective. Doors will not open or shut, wiring was altered,causing the doors to work irratically, and the van is so low that parts are falling off when I hit a pothole, etc.Judge Susan Borman, Detroit, told me in May, since the van and house were never taken before a probate judge for approval, that I might have a case against Farmer's Insurance, in order to provide my 10 year old granddaughter a safe home and van.We live in Pa. but the accident occurred in Michigan, while my grandchild was in foster care. Her situation in regards to the house and van are neither safe nor do they allow her any independence. Farmer's Insurance never told me a probate court judge had to approve these purchases, and I beleive I was coerced by them into signing, because their adjustor, Anne Marie Gregoire many times threatened to take my child and place her in a personal care home. Farmer's kept assigning new adjustors who gave me a very hard time for several years.I now know differently, but then I was under agreat deal of stress, due to the situation. Can you, or can you recommend someonme who can help resolve this situation for my little one? Sincerely,Donna

Posted by: donna frye | Sep 11, 2004 12:12:59 PM

The Michigan Court Of Appeals in an unpublished decision ruled that an injured employee's notice to his employer's claims service administrator of a workers' compensation claim arising from an accident with a company vehicle did not constitute notice to the employer's no-fault insurer, and as a result, the employee's suit for no-fault benefits, filed more than one year after the accident, was correctly dismissed as untimely.
- Watson v. Waste Management Of Michigan, Inc., et al.

Click here to read the full text of the majority opinion and click here to read the full text of the dissenting opinion.

Posted by: One Year Statue of Limitations | Jan 6, 2005 10:45:24 AM

Oakland County Circuit Court: No-Fault - Notice Provision - Motorcyclist. A motorcyclist's claim for no-fault benefits is untimely because it was more than two years after the accident and there is no legal or equitable basis upon which to toll the one-year notice provision contained in MCL 500.3145.
- Long v. Titan Ins. Co.

Posted by: No Tolling of First Party Statue | Jan 7, 2005 8:42:55 AM

The present maximum PIP benefit for wage loss as of Feruary, 2005 is $4,070. The number gets adjusted, so make sure to check with an attorney if you think you are being underpaid wage loss benefits.

Posted by: Maximum PIP Wage Loss Benefits | Mar 4, 2005 10:03:49 AM

I was injured in an auto accident on 8/16/07, and have been off work and am being compensated through wage loss benefits. My insurance company has now informed me that I will need to see a Disability doctor of their choice to verify my injuries. I am concerned bacause I have herniated discs in my cervical spine which prevent me from sitting/standing for long peroids of time. I have even lost my job as a medical receptionist/biller because of this accident. What will happen if they say I have to go back to work? I don't have a job to go back to, and I cannot do the type of work I have done for the last 18 years.

Posted by: Angela | Nov 9, 2007 4:53:42 PM

Post a comment