Currently browsing the

Attorney Perspective: Maximizing Domain Porfolio Value

Category.

Describe your situation:

Click to Contact a Cybersquatting Attorney Now.

03/27/2010

Foursquare Allows Domain Name Registration to Lapse

Social networking service Foursquare has made a common mistake: it allowed its domain name to lapse with registrar GoDaddy.  It is unclear whether this was because Foursquare maintained inaccurate WHOIS information, or whether its credit card had expired, but this is unfortunately a common issue. 

It is important to insure that your domain name's WHOIS information remains current, accurate, and complete, as the failure to maintain this information could result in the loss of your domain name.  If you have acquired trademark rights in your domain name, you may be entitled to recover it under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy or the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, but many times a party has yet to acquire trademark rights.  That is why it is important to diligently maintain your domain name portfolio, including your WHOIS information.

10/12/2009

Insure.com Domain Name Sells For $16 Million To QuinStreet

Domain News reports that Insure.com has sold for $16 million to QuinStreet.  QuinStreet is a vertical media and online marketing company located in Foster City, CA.  This sale is the largest publically reported domain name sale of the year and is an indicator that the domain name economy may be showing signs of a turn around. 

The transaction requires QuinStreet to submit an initial payment of $15 million in cash and a $1 million payment in 365 days.  Domain News reports that QuinStreet has been in the market for generic .com domain names in the past, and the company recently paid $18 million for a portfolio of names under the internet.com brand.

If you have a generic top-level domain name that you would like to sell, please contact one of our expert domain name attorneys today. We can help you structure the deal, provide you with domain name transfer agreements, and help you negotiate with the purchaser.

08/14/2008

"Low Value" Domain Parking Pages Results In Another Lawsuit Against Google By Advertisers

Parking pages remain under attack from advertisers as another lawsuit is filed against Google by one of its AdWords advertisers. It is unclear why this particular advertiser did not simply change their campaign settings to exclude the content network. In a previous post, it was suggested that Google may black list many parking pages from its AdSense program. Google previously stopped placing ads on its parked pages.

Google Hit with Another Suit For Fraud From PPC Program: Is this Final Straw For Domain Parking?

According to a report in Media Post Today, Google has been hit with a fraud lawsuit from its parked domain program, which serves pay-per-click ads on Web pages for a third time this summer. This newest case, a potential class-action lawsuit, filed this week in federal district court in Chicago, was brought by a container company, JIT Packaging. The case joins a putative class-action lawsuit filed in San Jose, Calif. last month by Hal Levitte, an attorney who took out search ads, and one brought in San Jose by online retailer RK West, which operates the e-commerce site Malibu Wholesale.

As in the other two lawsuits, JIT Packaging alleges that Google displayed search ads on “low-quality” sites that yielded almost no conversions.

Technorati Tags: , ,

08/04/2008

Domain Parking Pages to Be Excluded From Google's Advertising Network?

The following news story has been posted without confirmation. Even so, how long will it be before Google and Yahoo eliminate certain domains from its network in order to get click fraud under control. At the recent T.R.A.F.F.I.C Conference in Orlando, a Google executive made an appearance and warned domainers that Google was going ot be taking more aggressive action against click fraud. The suggestion is that some domainers create clicks, through software programs or human schemes, on the ads on their parked pages in order to fraudulently create adword revenue. Of course, advertisers using the Google adwords program are getting better at auditing click fraud and asking for refunds from Google.

Google Parking Changes Approaching « Is it me or is everyone else stupid?

From a reliable source Im told that Google has had enough of domain parking, though not all elements of it it seems. [the recent class action filing by Boston attorney Hal Levitte not being relevant at this point]. Google apparently have gotten fed up of policing their AFD program and are about to become proactive with a new domain parking algorithm.

This new algo will assess all domains calling their parking feed and immediately give domains either a “pass” or a “fail” score. Meaning that if Google decide your domain has little chance of type-in traffic or if it scores low on conversions, it wont serve you a parking feed. Simple as that. The details on what percentage of parked domains this will negatively affect is sketchy at best, but you can bet your bottom dollar the numbers will be significant.

A follow up post reporting that "over 90% of the high earning parked domains (those earning above $1k per month) are typos of another site or of a TM holder’s site" and  "Only 10% of the high earning parked domains are truly generic."
Technorati Tags: , ,

07/18/2008

Domain Name Return On Investment: Your Time Is Worth Something Too

Our friend Sahar Sarid over at Conceptualist.com has a great post about valuing a domain name.  Sahar points out that the sale price of a domain name should not only reflect the value of the domain, but also the costs associated with obtaining the domain, the risk involved, and the time that you have expended, including lost opportunities.

Continue reading Domain Name Return On Investment: Your Time Is Worth Something Too >>
06/03/2008

Excluding Keyword Categories From Your Parked Pages In Order To Avoid Cybersquatting Violations

Parking companies are handcuffed in many ways by their relationship with Google and Yahoo, who essentially control the framework by which ads are shown on parking pages.  Parking companies, however, now appear to realize the necessity of working with Google and Yahoo to develop options which allow a domain owner to exclude categories of ads which are shown on parked pages.  Based on several conversations with parking companies at the recent T.R.A.F.F.I.C show that keyword category and trademark exclusion will soon be available.

Continue reading Excluding Keyword Categories From Your Parked Pages In Order To Avoid Cybersquatting Violations >>
05/29/2008

One of the Rarely discussed Benefits of Domain and Website Development

There is a lot of talk on domainer blogs about developing domains.  With PPC revenue down and the tremendous amount of uncertainty surrounding parking pages, domainers are now developing their most valuable domains using a variety of techniques.  One tremendous benefit which development can provide is rarely discussed.  Most every one, two word and three word descriptive domain likely has trademark issues in one market or another.  Parking these pages can result in serving up ad links for competitors of trademark holders in what would otherwise be a descriptive domain.  For instance, the domain apple.com (which I am using only as an example) could serve up Google or Yahoo ads for a variety of different products and services including fruit, produce markets and related goods.  However, the domain apple.com, could not serve up ads for computers or other technology items consistent with Macintosh’s trademark registration for “apple.”  A failure to exclude technology products from the ads being served up on a parking page could result in a transfer of the domain to a trademark holder under the UDRP.

Continue reading One of the Rarely discussed Benefits of Domain and Website Development >>
02/29/2008

DataRecovery.com Domain Name Sells for $1.7 million: Highest Recorded Value So Far In 2008

ESS Data Recovery buys DataRecovery.com for $1.7M | Dominik Mueller

ESS Data Recovery, Inc. yesterday announced the purchase of the generic domain DataRecovery.com. ESS Data Recovery paid $1.7 million for the domain name, which makes this the highest reported domain sale of the year. The company will forward it to its existing, established website. It said it had bought the domain to set itself apart from the growing number of new data recovery companies and to attract more customers through the domain’s direct navigation traffic and generic nature:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

02/04/2008

If The Number '5' License Plate is Worth $6.8 Million, What Is Your Domain Name Worth?

Domain names and license plates share some common characteristics.  Both allow only one person to own a particular word or number.  The supply of good words, vanity words and generic words is finite.  Demand for those strong generic or descriptive words is high.  Where does supply meet demand on the price curve?  Domainers can learn from what is happening in a similar market for - of all things - vanity license plates.

The number "5" license plate sold for $6.8 million dollars in Saudi Arabia and another 300 vanity plates sold for another $56 million at last week's auction.  It is estimated that the number "1" will be auctioned next month for up to $20 million dollars.

The free market is just realizing the value of a domain name, driven by the fact that each domain name is unique and - typos and cybersquatters aside -  their 'one-of-a-kind' nature. Domain names are in many ways like lake front property.  There are only so many lots on the lake. The best lots with the best views and lake front are unique. Once you own that lot, no one else can have it.  It is yours.  As all of the lake property gets sold, values for all lot owners go up.  The supply becomes constrained.  Value and price go up.

What is your unique domain name worth?

Continue reading If The Number '5' License Plate is Worth $6.8 Million, What Is Your Domain Name Worth? >>
01/26/2008

Fusu, the world’s first Domain Stock Exchange opens up to a wider audience; Announces strategic partnership with EuroDNS

DomainPulse.com Fusu — The Domain Stock Exchange — Announces Public Beta and Key Partnership

With 140 million domains registered today and a market value that could reach $4 billion by 2010, the need for a dedicated platform where domain names purchasers and investors could meet and trade was sorely unaddressed until late 2007, when Fusu was pre-launched by a team of Internet professional to address that very issue. Because so few good names are still available, domains have become the real estate of the 21st century. More than 90,000 domain names are bought daily, with some achieving spectacular market values: Vodka.com sold for $3.5 million, Computer.com for $2.1 million.

Technorati Tags: , ,

 

Cybersquatting & Domain Name Dispute Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Attorneys / Lawyers

Cybersquatting: 'How To' Resources

  • Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia
    The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (also known as Truth in Domain Names Act), a United States federal law enacted in 1999, is part of A bill to amend the provisions of title 17, United States Code, and the Communications Act of 1934, relating to copyright licensing and carriage of broadcast signals by satellite (S. 1948). It makes people who register domain names that are either trademarks or individual's names with the sole intent of selling the rights of the domain name to the trademark holder or individual for a profit liable to civil action.
  • Typosquatting - Wikipedia
    Typosquatting, also called URL hijacking, is a form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes such as typographical errors made by Internet users when inputting a website address into a web browser. Should a user accidentally enter an incorrect website address, they may be led to an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter.
  • Reverse Domain Hijacking - Wikipedia
    The term reverse domain hijacking refers to the practice of inequitably unseating domain name registrants by accusing them of violating weak or non-existent trademarks related to the domain name.
  • Uniform DomainName DisputeResolution Policy - Wikipedia
    The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a process established by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for the resolution of disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names. The UDRP policy currently applies to all .biz, .com, .info, .name, .net, and .org top-level domains, and some country code top-level domains.
  • Cybersquatting - Wikipedia
    Cybersquatting, according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad-faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else.

ARCHIVES

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan