Currently browsing the

Domain Law Firm Alert: Dell Cybersquatting Litigation

Category.

Describe your situation:

Click to Contact a Cybersquatting Attorney Now.

12/15/2007

Domain Tasting is Bad for The Internet, Domaining and ICANN's Credibility

The Dell lawsuit has the potential to put the practice of domain tasting on the front page, as has already occurred when its lawsuit which was picked up by the Washington Post.  Will Dell and its friends in the trademark rights world take advantage of this unique opportunity?  Will they take this opportunity to educate the public and other corporations about the largely invisible practice of domain tasting and cybersquatting?

Most companies have little knowledge and understanding of domain tasting, cybersquatting or typosquatting. Most don't know their internet business, web traffic and revenue is being diverted each and every second of each and every day. Many are oblivious to the fact that their famous trademarks are under attack in cyberspace and that their customers are being diverted to their competitors.

Continue reading Domain Tasting is Bad for The Internet, Domaining and ICANN's Credibility >>

Dell Lawsuit Exposes the Seedy Side of Domaining and Domain Monetization

Follow the Latest Developments In The Dell Typosquatting / ACPA Lawsuit Here.

At the heart of the Dell ACPA cybersquatting lawsuit is the concept of the now highly controversial Add Grace Period (AGP) implemented by ICANN, which is  the technological and policy foundation of domain tasting.  A Grace Period refers to a specified number of calendar days following a Registry operation in which a domain action may be reversed and a credit may be issued to a registrar. AGP is typically the five day period following the initial registration of a domain name. AGP appears as a contractual term in some, but not all gTLD registry agreements.

AGP was implemented for consumers to correct of typos and other errors by registrants. Once a domain name is deleted by the registry at this stage, it is immediately available for registration by any registrant through any registrar. When a domain name is registered through an ICANN accredited registrar, that registrar may cancel the domain name at any time during the first five calendar days of the registration and receive a full credit for the registration fee from the registry.

Few companies have publicly taken on the serious serious issues of cybersquatting and the policies of ICANN which create and support the practice of domain tasting, a commercial activity which has little if any legitimate justification in cyberspace. Few companies have the financial ability to take these matters to court and expose the seedy practices of cybersquatting, typosquatting and domain tasting. In many instances, the defendants are hard to locate or even identify, making the possibility of collecting damages remote.

In the Dell lawsuit, it is alleged that the defendants set up a network that cycled infringing domain names from one registrar to the next in order to hold onto the domains indefinitely without ever paying for them, all the while profiting from pay-per-click ads on the sites that often served visitors with ads for Dell's competitors.  These allegations suggest one of the most obvious examples of intentional bad faith cybersquatting. Unfortunately, this level of cyber and typosquatting is not only common, but rampant on the world wide web today.

These blatant squatters are also difficult to coral.  Because of private registration, it is often difficult to identify the registrant behind a particular domain registration. Even if the registrant is identified, the more sophisticated squatters use offshore companies to The complaint further charges that the registrars created and controlled a series of shell corporations in the Bahamas to act as the entities registering the domains, including Caribbean Online International, Domain Drop S.A., Domibot, Highlands International Investment, Keyword Marketing Inc., Maison Tropicale, Marketing Total S.A, Click Cons Ltd., Wan-Fu China Ltd. and Web Advertising Corp.

Continue reading Dell Lawsuit Exposes the Seedy Side of Domaining and Domain Monetization >>

Dell v. Belgium Domains et al: Potential Damages of $110,000,000.00

Dell_logo2Dell, Inc and Alienware Corporation filed the federal complaint against BelgiumDomains, LLC, CapitolDomains, LLC, DomainDoorman,LLC, Netrian Ventures, LTD,  IHoldings.com, Inc., Juan Pablo Vazquez and Joe Doe Defendants on October 7, 2007.  The complaint was filed under seal until Dell could get its request for injunctive relief heard by the court, asking for an order that the domains get locked down and evidence be preserved, among other emergency ex parte relief .

Read the Complaint Filed By Dell Here. (large file, be patient)

Dell and Alienware are brought claims for cybersquatting under 15 USC 1125(d), trademark infringement and trademark counterfeiting under 15 USC 111491), trademark and trade name infringement under Florida law, trademark infringement and false designation of origin under 15 USC 1125(a), trademark dilution under 15 USC 1125(c) and various other causes of action under Florida law.

Defendants are alleged to be ICANN accredited registrars who developed a scheme to engage in broad -based computer generated typosquatting, leveraging their status as ICANN accredited registrars. Dell alleges that Defendants have registered over 1,100 domains which infringe their famous marks including the following examples:

Continue reading Dell v. Belgium Domains et al: Potential Damages of $110,000,000.00 >>

Dell Cybersquatting Complaint Re: Domain Typo-Tasting

Follow the Latest Developments In The Dell Typosquatting / ACPA Lawsuit Here.

Dell claims that organizations doling out domain names have deployed a network of shell businesses that profit from internet web surfers who make typos while entering URLs.  These internet users use direct navigation by entering the URL directly in the address bar of their web browser, as opposed to using a search engines such as Google. It is becoming clear that a larger number of people use direct navigation and that a significant percentage of those people mis-type the URL into the browser address bar.  Unfortunately, this business model works best when the typographical error is related to a famous web site or company with preexisting trademark rights. Typographical errors by direct navigators looking for famous companies, such as Dell, creates enough traffic to make it worthwhile for typosquatters to pay for these domains and run the risk of lawsuits by trademark registrants. In this lawsuit, Dell alleges that these typosquatters have created a scheme to avoid paying any registration fees at all.

Dell's federal suit, filed in October with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, names three registrars -- BelgiumDomains, CapitolDomains, and DomainDoorman -- and claims they have set up a string of Caribbean-based shell corporations that gain rights to typo domain names and take in the pay-per-click revenues, according to The Washington Post.

Continue reading Dell Cybersquatting Complaint Re: Domain Typo-Tasting >>
12/03/2007

Dell Files Cybersquatting Lawsuit against Domain Name Companies

In a lawsuit filed in Florida, Dell charges Juan Pablo Vazquez of Miami, Florida, several unknown individuals, and a handful of domain name companies with violating its trademarks on more than 1,100 domain names.

The lawsuit, unsealed two weeks ago, accuses the defendants of cybersquatting, trademark infringement and dilution, counterfeiting, deceptive trade practices, and unfair competition.

Dell alleges that the defendants registered domains that contain the name "dell," or something close to it, and used the infringing domains to host "'pay-per-click' Web sites that display or displayed advertising links to various commercial Web sites" and to offer goods or services identical or similar to Dell's sites.

The lawsuit also claims the defendants set their sites up to serve pop-up and pop-under ads, and thereby earned ad revenue off Dell's trademarked names.

Cybersquatting -- using, registering, or profiting in bad faith from a domain name that's identical or similar to an established trademark -- and typosquatting -- using, registering, or profiting in bad faith from a domain name that's a deliberately misspelled version of an established trademark -- isn't only a problem for Dell. many other companies are having their internet traffic diverted by typosquatting and other forms of cybersquatting...

Read more about the Dell cybersquatting article here:

- Dell claims that there is a network of shell businesses that profit from people who make typos while entering URLs

- Dell Fights Cybersquatters And Rogue Resellers In Court

Will Google AdSense be Impacted by the Dell Lawsuit?

Cybersquatting & Domain Name Dispute Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Attorneys / Lawyers

Cybersquatting: 'How To' Resources

  • Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia
    The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (also known as Truth in Domain Names Act), a United States federal law enacted in 1999, is part of A bill to amend the provisions of title 17, United States Code, and the Communications Act of 1934, relating to copyright licensing and carriage of broadcast signals by satellite (S. 1948). It makes people who register domain names that are either trademarks or individual's names with the sole intent of selling the rights of the domain name to the trademark holder or individual for a profit liable to civil action.
  • Typosquatting - Wikipedia
    Typosquatting, also called URL hijacking, is a form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes such as typographical errors made by Internet users when inputting a website address into a web browser. Should a user accidentally enter an incorrect website address, they may be led to an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter.
  • Reverse Domain Hijacking - Wikipedia
    The term reverse domain hijacking refers to the practice of inequitably unseating domain name registrants by accusing them of violating weak or non-existent trademarks related to the domain name.
  • Uniform DomainName DisputeResolution Policy - Wikipedia
    The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a process established by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for the resolution of disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names. The UDRP policy currently applies to all .biz, .com, .info, .name, .net, and .org top-level domains, and some country code top-level domains.
  • Cybersquatting - Wikipedia
    Cybersquatting, according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad-faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else.

ARCHIVES

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan