05/04/2010

How to Get Your Stolen Domain Name Back When Cybersquatting Law Will Not Help

Has your domain name been stolen? 

What do you do when your domain name has been stolen but you lack the requisite trademark rights to recover the domain via a domain arbitration under Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) or a lawsuit under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA)?  Keep in mind that both the elements of the UDRP and the ACPA require that the prior owner of the domain name own a valid, protectable trademark corresponding to the domain name.  Moreover, both the UDRP and ACPA require a bad faith intent to profit from the registration and/or use of the domain name.  Oftentimes a domain name may be taken by a hacker, a disgruntled employee, a web developer, or the like leaving you, as the one-time registrant and previous owner left wondering what can be done.  Domain names are not property like a bicycle, computer, or pair of shoes right?

[Click the link for more information on trademark registration]

More information about how to retrieve a stolen domain name:

Wrong.  There is hope.  Recent court decisions have held that domain names are property.  We have previously discussed the California domain name case that held that domain names are intangible personal property and are subject to claims of conversion.  The more recent Ninth Circuit case has held that domain names are property for purposes of conversion by theft or fraud.  The finding that domain names are property rights as opposed to contract rights is essential to a conversion claim.

A lawsuit for conversion of property does not require that the prior domain name owner establish trademark rights in the domain name.  Rather, conversion generally requires (1) you own or have the right to possess the personal property; (2) the defendant intentionally interfered with your property; (3) the interference deprived you of possession or use of the personal property; and (4) that you were damaged as a result of the interference.  Thus, so long as you as the prior domain name owner can establish these elements, you likely have another avenue to redress the stolen domain.

If you were the registrant of, or owned, a domain name, no longer can access the domain name and control it via the domain name manager account or otherwise, and believe you have been the victim of conversion, you should contact a domain name attorney to understand your options.  Domain names, like both real and personal property, have value worth protecting and there are options available to get a stolen domain name back.

COMMENTS

If you have trademark rights in the domain (meaning you have trademark rights in the word which is used for the domain), then getting your domain back is typically accomplished with a threat letter. Sometimes, the web developer will provide emails showing that you consented to have them register the domain for you and thus you can not have the domain name back. These cases depend in part on how the communications rolled out and what they say.

Under any scenario, your trademark rights give you leverage over your domain name. Even without trademark rights, you may have a contractual right to the domain name.

I need to know how to get a domain name back. My web developer registered the domain name in his own name and now won' turn it over. he says there is a billing dispute. But I own the trademark registration so how can my web guy hold my domain name ransom for a bogus bill?

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834208fd253ef0133ed2decee970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How to Get Your Stolen Domain Name Back When Cybersquatting Law Will Not Help:

Cybersquatting & Domain Name Dispute Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Attorneys / Lawyers

Cybersquatting: 'How To' Resources

  • Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia
    The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (also known as Truth in Domain Names Act), a United States federal law enacted in 1999, is part of A bill to amend the provisions of title 17, United States Code, and the Communications Act of 1934, relating to copyright licensing and carriage of broadcast signals by satellite (S. 1948). It makes people who register domain names that are either trademarks or individual's names with the sole intent of selling the rights of the domain name to the trademark holder or individual for a profit liable to civil action.
  • Typosquatting - Wikipedia
    Typosquatting, also called URL hijacking, is a form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes such as typographical errors made by Internet users when inputting a website address into a web browser. Should a user accidentally enter an incorrect website address, they may be led to an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter.
  • Reverse Domain Hijacking - Wikipedia
    The term reverse domain hijacking refers to the practice of inequitably unseating domain name registrants by accusing them of violating weak or non-existent trademarks related to the domain name.
  • Uniform DomainName DisputeResolution Policy - Wikipedia
    The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a process established by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for the resolution of disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names. The UDRP policy currently applies to all .biz, .com, .info, .name, .net, and .org top-level domains, and some country code top-level domains.
  • Cybersquatting - Wikipedia
    Cybersquatting, according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad-faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else.

ARCHIVES

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan