05/19/2009

Handling Trademark Challenges in an Online World

Get the latest information on trademark issues implicated in the launching of online advertising campaigns, including the purchase of keywords, buying display ads, developing and protecting taglines, and acquiring associated domain names.

Moderator:

  • Russell Pangborn, Microsoft Corporation (United States)

Speakers:

  • Nicholas Bolter, Howrey LLP (United Kingdom)
  • Fabricio Vayra, Time Warner Inc.
  • Suzanne V. Wilson, Arnold & Porter LLP (United States)

1ese1 What do you do when you launch a new brand in cyberspace?

Laughter when panelist suggests he is not too worried because the "advertising company" has cleared the trademarks. Of course, we all know that advertising and marketing companies are no t the entity to 'clear' your marks.   More laughter since the brand name chosen still has not been registered as a domain name.

You need to understand the scope and nature of the campaign: keywords, social networks, banner ads What countries will be targeted.

Register defensively and defensively other extensions and productnamesucks.com.  [this is really basic stuff. could trademark attorneys not know this stuff already].  Courts still look at meta tags on issues of intent. So be careful. The meta tags won't help you in search results anyway. 

Keyword advertising is a hot issue.  Panel shows audience what a Google advertisement looks like [again, hard ot believe that trademark attorneys would not know this stuff]. Use of keywords by competitors is still very new law.  Current state of US law is that the sale and use of a keyword is "use in commerce."  Second Circuit had previously held that it was not 'use in commerce' but Rescuecom changed that.  Focus is now on whether purchase of keyword and text result in trademark infringement. Focus is on the text of the advertisements.  Initial interest confusion is a key part of the focus.In the EU, it is still up in the air.  However, identical use need not prove confusion.

Banner Ads:  What keywords trigger the banner?  What trade dress issues might arise. What does the banner ad link to?  There is a lot of activity in the comparative advertising space. Beware of banner ads which are fraudulent or display your ad in a place which dilutes your mark. There are also instances where the display page is coded to engage in bad activity. Don't delegate where your ads are appearing.  You need to control and know what is happening with your ads.

Affiliate Programs:  You need to have control of your brand.  Can't simply hand it off.  Need to know who the thrid party is, where the brands will be used and what will be said.  Must control your affiliates. They may try to register domain names with your brand in it.You also need to control keyword advertisements. You offer bounties to affiliates for every person you bring to door or subscription. 

Viral Marketing:  Consider consumer reaction and rules.  You can't always predict the reaction.

Social Networking:  Consider underlying rules and ramifications. Again, there are fewer controls in place and things can go wrong quickly.

Community Sites / Blogging / Micro Blogging -  Twitter and other tools are great but again your brand is being published in places you may not fully appreciate.  You need guidelines and a point person who is responsible for this.If thrid parties register your brands as twitter accounts, you may have a problem convincing twitter to help you. Facebook users may want to start fan sites which suggest that they are authorized to speak for you.  Consider developing guidelines and crating a community of fan brand.

Employee Blogging:  This is a challenging area. You need to make sure employees whoa re not authorized to speak for the company don't misrepresent their authority.  Also, you need to make sure no one monetizes your brands.

Too often, your legal department makes arguments and you find out you are doing the same thing.

Licensing of domain names:  We try an ensure registrant info remains with the trademark holder.  Typically, we do not grant those rights. Control your brand.

COMMENTS

I agree with you, except I think companies should not take their "sucks" version of their domain because it would signal that they lack self-confidence in their product/brand offering.

Overall, I consider it an immature way to silence free speech.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834208fd253ef01156fa288d6970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Handling Trademark Challenges in an Online World:

Cybersquatting & Domain Name Dispute Blog Homepage: Cybersquatting & Domain Dispute Attorneys / Lawyers

Cybersquatting: 'How To' Resources

  • Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia
    The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (also known as Truth in Domain Names Act), a United States federal law enacted in 1999, is part of A bill to amend the provisions of title 17, United States Code, and the Communications Act of 1934, relating to copyright licensing and carriage of broadcast signals by satellite (S. 1948). It makes people who register domain names that are either trademarks or individual's names with the sole intent of selling the rights of the domain name to the trademark holder or individual for a profit liable to civil action.
  • Typosquatting - Wikipedia
    Typosquatting, also called URL hijacking, is a form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes such as typographical errors made by Internet users when inputting a website address into a web browser. Should a user accidentally enter an incorrect website address, they may be led to an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter.
  • Reverse Domain Hijacking - Wikipedia
    The term reverse domain hijacking refers to the practice of inequitably unseating domain name registrants by accusing them of violating weak or non-existent trademarks related to the domain name.
  • Uniform DomainName DisputeResolution Policy - Wikipedia
    The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a process established by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for the resolution of disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names. The UDRP policy currently applies to all .biz, .com, .info, .name, .net, and .org top-level domains, and some country code top-level domains.
  • Cybersquatting - Wikipedia
    Cybersquatting, according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad-faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else.

ARCHIVES

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan